A corporate employee's perspective - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

3.0
Jan 30, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The company is working on some interesting technologies and solutions that have a surprisingly broad reach. Every time that you think you are getting a grasp on everything, you'll always learn about something else. - Company trusts employees to be self-directed (but sometimes does not offer enough direction). - Flexible working hours & ability to work from home. - Lots of charitable events and opportunities to get involved with the community. - Internal employee intranet acts as an online forum for all employees (a good place to ask questions and get answers).

Cons

- Limited access to executive-level management. Regular employees do not have keycard access to their floor and are discouraged from contacting them by email or speaking to them in passing. Who are these people? - Numerous reorganizations and layoffs in recent years have had a lasting impact on employee morale. - Benefits have taken a dive since the recession (hoping to see them bounce back as the economy stabilizes). - As evidenced by the number of people who choose to work from home, the new standard cubicle workspace is unworkable. Most floors are ghost towns.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All