Toxic work environment promoted by UK service management - Field Service Engineer Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Oct 8, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Varied and interesting job, wages good.

Cons

unfortunately your continuously let down by the equipment as out of box failures are common place and make the tech look bad even though its not their fault. Engineers are encouraged to cover up machine issues, asked to reboot machines at certain times to prevent them for doing self checks etc. Employees are asked to work ridiculous hours, health and safety is very strict until it comes to a machine breakdown, then your told to lift heavy equipment, at height, on your own and possibly at night but don't get caught. Bullying is rife across UK and Ireland. Service Top management thinks he's still in the military. Covid was just a flu apparently... Work life balance is non existent. Smiths or Rapiscan would be much better to work for,possibly less money but better overall.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All