Great Place to Work - Accountant Leidos Employee Review

5.0
Jun 11, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos has really proven their commitment to their employees during the Covid-19 pandemic. They reacted quickly and prioritized employees' health and well-being. Leidos has made multiple resources available in order to keep their employees healthy, both physically and mentally. Leidos has done a wonderful job of communicating with their workforce and listening to our concerns. Leidos prioritizes career development. If you are looking for somewhere to grow your career, this is a wonderful place. There are multiple training opportunities and the management really supports their employees' development. Pre-covid-19, the thing I find most impressive about Leidos is that they really make efforts to listen to their employees. They take employee feedback seriously and are quick to implement practices to address concerns. Leidos truly makes me feel valued. Since the pandemic though, I've been so overwhelmingly pleased with Leidos' response that I would rank that as the biggest pro of working here.

Cons

It takes sometime to acclimate to the company as a new employee. If you join the team, I would encourage you to take time to adjust and learn the "lay of the land" before making a snap judgement.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

6% 401K Match and 10% Discount for Employee Stock Purchase Program

Cons

No cons to say at this time

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All