Ok. - Cloud Systems Engineer Leidos Employee Review

4.0
Aug 8, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible Schedule. Great benefits. Great employee discounts. The people are nice and the environment is laid back. Management is pretty cool. Good for entry level. The work/life balance is pretty good (but if your shift is during a Holiday, you have to work it unless you request off and someone is willing to cover. People are nice enough to cover your shift. That's a pro). 10 hours shifts, 4 days a week. So you have 3 days off. Team bonuses if tasks are completed in a timely manner.

Cons

Contract. As of today, the contract is ending in about a month+ and there is no official announcement. We only know via word of mouth. Pay isn't that great compared to what you could be making. Relocated from Chevy Chase to Reston. No consideration for the employees. This made our compute at lease an hour, without traffic. The schedule changes every 3 months. 24/7 365 operations (including Holidays). Your shift must be covered in order to take off. I feel there is no growth. Once you learn the few tasks, that's it. Not many positions to move up to.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great benefits and career pathing

Cons

No cons that I can think of

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All