Could be so much better - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

3.0
May 31, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible working, great people, relaxed environment, decent benefits (though not as many employee discount perks when it was Lockheed Martin), pension match up to 7%, reasonable amount of annual leave.

Cons

They do not seem to value current employees. New starts will always earn more than individuals working for the business for 2 years or more, unless it's senior management of course. Once you have been hired, don't expect an increase in salary more than 2-3% a year. Though I suppose we should be grateful for the increases at all, but you will quickly fall behind market rates. Also lack of communication from Management Teams, and constantly changing processes, restructuring, internal conflicts, lack of resources. It can be very frustrating and alarming. We have no idea where the business is headed in the future or what the intentions are with Leidos UK.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All