A slower place to work - Group Leader/Manager Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Apr 18, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This might be a good place to work if you only want to take a paycheck home without thinking too much about future career development. If you are old and waiting for your retirement, why not?!

Cons

The pay scale is just slightly better than university level, and far lower than industrial level, and also significantly lower than government level. This could be a killing place if you have passion on science and have goal with your career. You basically have no chance to do any creative staff. Most technicians do what they ask to do. They cannot tell your clearly what, why, how to do the research. They seem just finish procedure and do not care about the results. Indeed, the high level people do not care about the results much either. They can fairly survive by showing "We are busy in doing something." Full of politics and office rumors. Creative scientists have no much room to survive. Bad!!

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work from home

Cons

There is few opportunities to promote

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All