Corporate "Efficiency" is Killing the Company - Supply Chain L3Harris Employee Review

2.0
Sep 5, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Clean Gyms -Clean facilities and bathrooms -9/80 is good -Local teams are good -Education opportunities -Pebble Ice Machines Everywhere! -Good Pay Initially

Cons

-4/10s were removed to promote "efficiency" AKA management needs more days to yell at employees -Benefits and Insurance plans have gotten severely worse -Remote work and hybrid schedules have been removed at the protest of everybody -Layoffs are frequent and they target senior employees first -DEI garbage is all over the company, claims it is not "political" -Leaders have a high turn over rate, their new "efficiencies" cause bigger problems down the line -Morale is at an all time low -Leadership has fake "all hands" meetings where they don't address the real concerns of employees. -Promotions/Role changes only apply to those who are external, no promoting from within -Policies change without proper training -Very fake sense of confidence/security within the company -Corporate leadership has stated that Republicans are racist and are asking employees to vote for Democrats -Claim to have great work life balance, but they keeping laying off people without backfilling positions. Understaffed and Overworked! -"LHX NEXT" is just a way for the company to announce layoffs, its not a new toolset for employees

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All