Bad Corporate Culture - Anonymous employee L3Harris Employee Review

1.0
Sep 30, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They offer PTO, Health benefits, and retirement benefit. These are average at best and not really a pro since most companies offer these. Employees, mostly those in the trenches, are great people and a joy to work with.

Cons

Since L3 and Harris merger discovered it was more of a less hostile take over. Forcing their bad management into positions of power over current managers. We were moved into a building that had no space and now we all have little room making for very crowded positions. We have to pay for that space from them so really not a merger. Management, especially the higher tiers, is so bad from Harris it really isn't even funny. The corporate mindset is why many workers are leaving companies in droves. These managers from Harris are the reason why. If you come in on your day off and work 8 hours after already working 50 plus hours during the week they want you to stay even later. Had 2 employees with family items and they were told they need to be in because they have no back ups due to those previous workers leaving. Their lack of caring about the workers is truly the most disgusting thing I have experienced at a company. The employees low moral because of this is very disheartening. Our group has lost at least 75% (not an exaggeration) of the employees in the group since moving into this building. Even a couple employees didn't even stay 2 years. If you are on on the floor they will continually ask you to work days off which is the weekends and holidays due to their concern over money and the lack of employees.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Apr 6, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Cons

The workplace was old and outdated.

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All