OK company not the greatest - Integration Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

3.0
Jun 21, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent pay for higher level engineers. Recommend to get hired into the position as the merit increases are minimal

Cons

My experience has been only on 1 project with L3Harris and have heard general demeanor is much better on other programs. Poor project management. solution is through more management at problem or behind scheduled tasks limited hiring capability poor insight to future needs. terrible working hours and various requests.

avatar
L3Harris Response
4y
We are sorry to hear your experience with us has not met your expectations. Work/life integration is important to our employee experience, and we encourage you to reach out to your HR Business Partner to see if you can find solutions that can help with this. Thank you for leaving a review.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All