Great engineering company committed to advanced technology development - Director of E L3Harris Employee Review

5.0
Mar 12, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong focus on career development with lots of internal opportunities to grow, to move around the company, and work on different programs. Agile processes - doesn't get bogged down in the details and red tape. Focus is on investing in new technologies and competitive discriminators.

Cons

Still coming out of the merger and just now finishing up alignment among all the different legacy L3 and legacy Harris businesses.

avatar
L3Harris Response
6y
Thank you for your response. We're glad to hear you're enjoying your experience at L3Harris. You are right; we provide many tools for employees to assist in their career development, such as the career framework. We recognize any change, like the harmonization of business can be tough but we're excited for the future of L3Harris!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All