Best Company I have Ever Worked For - Talent Acquisition L3Harris Employee Review

5.0
Dec 13, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth opportunities, supportive environment, casual dress, compensation

Cons

Big company with some post merger pains, but a lot of opportunities for those who seek them out.

avatar
L3Harris Response
6y
Thanks for taking time to leave your thoughts on working at L3Harris. We are working hard to create a great culture here at L3Harris, and we're glad to hear you take value in areas like our Dress for Your Day initiative. Employees are encouraged to seek out new positions and experiences, and we have provided internal resources to help employees identify what skills and experiences are required to make their next move. We appreciate everything you do for us!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All