eh - Associate Kantar Employee Review

3.0
Dec 14, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This company offers a standout work environment with the flexibility of time off, allowing employees to achieve a healthier work-life balance. The remarkable connections and camaraderie among colleagues create a positive and collaborative atmosphere, fostering a sense of belonging and mutual support. Furthermore, the company boasts an impressive client portfolio, providing employees with opportunities to work on exciting projects and develop valuable skills. Overall, the combination of flexible time off, strong interpersonal connections, and an excellent client portfolio makes this company an appealing place to work.

Cons

This company's constant leadership changes and restructuring have created an atmosphere of instability, making it challenging for employees to establish a sense of direction or stability in their roles. The lack of consistent leadership has led to unclear communication, disjointed strategies, and a general feeling of uncertainty among the workforce. This frequent restructuring not only disrupts workflow but also hampers employee morale, as the team is left grappling with frequent changes in management and organizational structure. Overall, the company's struggle to maintain stable leadership negatively impacts both the organizational culture and the effectiveness of its operations.

avatar
Kantar Response
2y
Thank you for leaving us a review.

Explore other reviews about Kantar

2.0
May 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hard working associates, mostly bright (and admirable) heads of department. Good benefits. Previous CEO seemed like a genuinely nice guy and would listen to you if you approached him about something.

Cons

There’s a lot of reasons why top notch talent has long jumped ship. Great at sounding smart…terrible at actually getting the revenue to avoid the wholesale data asset sell offs going on. Terribly overcomplicated product portfolios with inflexible solutions at higher costs than smaller leading agencies that have outpaced them. Department heads gaslighting everyone under VPs about performance when they aren’t winning the internal Hunger Games and are told to reduce headcount.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All