Great Company - Anonymous employee Infor Employee Review

5.0
Jan 9, 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

All companies have their ups and downs. Infor is no exception. I've worked for other "leading" software companies and Infor has more flexibility, more creativity, and more entreprenuial spirit then ANY of the others. At other "big ERP" companies, many employees join, then check-out. You can't check out at Infor, you have to work. This is what makes the place great. You work with some of the smartest, some of the most aggressive and some of the most creative people in the world. The concept of paternalism doesn't exist at any company, and many posts in this blogsphere seem to indicate this is a given and a corporate requirement. Infor rewards creativity, and it rewards people who work to make change happen. I give it two thumbs up.

Cons

The company has no real market presence from a non-current customer knowledge perspective, yet is one of the largest software providers in the world. No one knows who Infor is, and what Infor stands for. It's an issue, and the recent advertising campaign (good or bad, it doesn't matter) is a great start, it needs more.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Cons

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Infor Response
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All