Nice people, no micromanagement, lot of work to do - Senior Software Engineer Infor Employee Review

5.0
Sep 14, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Project I am working on have an interesting architecture and up to date technologies No micromanagement by the team lead or higher management Friendly team members , mostly young, talented and curious. Lot of team buildings if there is no restriction Hiring process went very smoothly,100% remote and easy. I have received contract and equipment by the post and in first week my project was up and running. I have been allowed to use operation system I choose Competitive salary, a bit over market standard but still there is room. Covid pros: I have completed interview process before 2020 and agreed start date was in 1st quarter of 2020, Even after covid impact there were no contact update/or cancellation request. It has been 3 month and I have started with the negotiated salary Hygiene, rules and cleaning done properly, you receive regular email updates

Cons

Due to nature of application there are lot of internal components and documentation. Even documentation mostly good there is a learning curve. Given notebooks are OK but could be better Coffee machine in our floor needs some work but everyone is remote atm.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
Aug 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good culture and work environment

Cons

Low average salary compared to abroad offices

3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All