Started off great...downhill from there - Anonymous employee Infor Employee Review

2.0
Jan 15, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work life balance; good people overall. Nice work area and working environment. Some positions allow for telework.

Cons

Started off great, went downhill after the SSA acquisition. Executives from SSA were brought on board who sang a good song, but couldn't deliver....at all. Anything. These guys couldn't deliver a pizza if it was handed to them. Of course most of these fellas are long gone along with their pack of cronies after they made a complete mess of things, but the tradition still continues. Good ol' boy network in place whether they say it or not. If a new chief comes along and he has his own Indians, better start packing. Although I performed solidly for many years, was let go by a manager who had his own team. I wasn't the only one who found themselves in this position. It doesn't help when you're replaced by a knuckle-dragger who barely knows the business but knows the new boss. Meh, it happens. But there is more churn at this company than a bucket of butter, so if you're looking for job security, better look elsewhere. If you do find yourself there, keep a box at your desk in the event management decides to replace you with their buddy from a previous life.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
Mar 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much volatility Work life balance Strong culture

Cons

Big company, slow to change Heavy bureaucracy Nepotism

3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All