Good company except for a couple of bad managers - Senior Software Engineer Hiver Employee Review

2.0
Nov 10, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good company with a lot of challenges to work through Upper management can be be very receptive to feedback sometimes Quality of work is something that you'll not find in a lot of companies

Cons

Not all managers are adept to do their job, they rather want to get by, by trying to blame juniors for their mistakes and delays, and as a manager it's really your fault if you can't manage you team and their deadlines properly Lack of ownership and accountability by certain manager (unnamed) I would have given a higher rating to the company if only it wasn't for the impossible number of fake reviews and just the CEO is straight away denying them openly Policy of asking employees to put a good review immediately after they join so no cons can be mentioned Dedicated team to put fake reviews which are beyond obvious to anyone who's worked here. Immoral and borderline manipulative approach to resolve conflicts between the managers and the rest of the team

avatar
Hiver Response
4y
Thanks for your review. We do request Hiver employees to write reviews for us on Glassdoor from time to time, but every review is written by them and reflects their opinions. We’ve never done “fake” reviews, and never will. We welcome your feedback on how we can improve. As you know and as we keep reiterating, both Nitesh and I are just a Slack message away. I genuinely look forward to every single interaction with every member of our team on any subject. Please reach out to me on Slack - we look forward to learning from your experience and improving.

Explore other reviews about Hiver

5.0
Jul 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Strong leadership -Great product -Amazing culture -Vision

Cons

-None that I can think of

1
5.0
Sep 29, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- You get to work on production systems from the first week. The team cannot afford to waste any developer's time with busywork. - Can work with a wide array of tech. - The senior members of the team are highly competent and good at what they do. One can learn a lot just from observing how they work. - Good programming practices such as code reviews with actual constructive feedback. - Both frontend and backend teams have interesting challenges to solve. - Approachable senior management and overall a very helpful atmosphere. I never had to think twice before approaching even the founders or the head of engineering for something. - Employee friendly HR team. - The product itself is very well thought out and highly reviewed in the industry, with a deep product roadmap. - The head of engineering puts in a lot of effort to ensure that every developer gets to work on interesting stuff, and that things do not get monotonous for anyone.

Cons

No actual cons I can think of. One thing is that if someone wants to work full stack (without specializing in frontend or backend development), this might not be the place for it. Almost every developer specialized in either frontend or backend, since the engineering team has the belief that specialization breeds productivity (which is correct). This might have changed after I left. Sometimes developers might need to work on a particularly gnarly piece of legacy code, which can be quite difficult. However most of the code is quite easy to work with and extend, and regular refactoring effort is constantly improving the code quality.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All