Supply Chain - Associate Technical Professional Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Jun 10, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great opportunities abroad in all different locations. Compensation in expat benefits competes to be the best in the industry. Work life balance will be sacrificed when first starting out, but that is the case at most companies. In supply chain, they promote from within and quickly - if you log in the time and commitment, it doesn't go unnoticed.

Cons

Overall strategy is weak between field operations and supply chain. however leadership is working to change this and change can be noticed. While Halliburton promotes fast and quickly, sometimes the change management process can be difficult to adapt to when you manager is changing once to twice a year.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All