Great Compensation, Terrible Aesthetic - Senior Software Engineer Google Employee Review

4.0
Nov 14, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Google's highly structured algorithmic compensation planning and promotion system has helped me climb the individual contributor ladder quickly, after languishing in junior roles at startups for several years. The benefits package is to die for, especially as a transgender woman attempting to start a family.

Cons

Google has no aesthetic sensibility whatsoever. Google's rigorous focus on metrics means that anything that can be easily measured is optimized for, and anything that is difficult to measure is systematically neglected. Many important aspects of product design and software engineering exist in this subjective realm, and are impossible to turn our focus upon without being punished by the performance review process. Many of Google's important internal tools, including such essentials as source control and front-end frameworks, are hilariously antiquated. Google is systemically allergic to third-party dependencies and essentially out of conversation with the open source community. Internally, many open source best practices are regarded with open hostility. Turnover is very high, and org charts are very deep. Conversations with decision-makers are filtered through many layers of management, resulting in game-of-telephone miscommunication and planning processes which move slower than market conditions. Short-term thinking is systemically encouraged by itinerant managers and ICs eager to achieve promotion quickly and move on to their next team. Nevertheless, meaningful work is possible for ICs who are steel-nerved and internally motivated.

Explore other reviews about Google

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work in my whole career

Cons

No complaint at all. So far so good

4.0
Jun 21, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) Food, food, food. 15+ cafes on main campus (MTV) alone. Mini-kitchens, snacks, drinks, free breakfast/lunch/dinner, all day, errr'day. 2) Benefits/perks. Free 24:7 gym access (on MTV campus). Free (self service) laundry (washer/dryer) available. Bowling alley. Volley ball pit. Custom-built and exclusive employee use only outdoor sport park (MTV). Free health/fitness assessments. Dog-friendly. Etc. etc. etc. 3) Compensation. In ~2010 or 2011, Google updated its compensation packages so that they were more competitive. 4) For the size of the organization (30K+), it has remained relatively innovative, nimble, and fast-paced and open with communication but, that is definitely changing (for the worse). 5) With so many departments, focus areas, and products, *in theory*, you should have plenty of opportunity to grow your career (horizontally or vertically). In practice, not true. 6) You get to work with some of the brightest, most innovative and hard-working/diligent minds in the industry. There's a "con" to that, too (see below).

Cons

1) Work/life balance. What balance? All those perks and benefits are an illusion. They keep you at work and they help you to be more productive. I've never met anybody at Google who actually time off on weekends or on vacations. You may not hear management say, "You have to work on weekends/vacations" but, they set the culture by doing so - and it inevitably trickles down. I don't know if Google inadvertently hires the work-a-holics or if they create work-a-holics in us. Regardless, I have seen way too many of the following: marriages fall apart, colleagues choosing work and projects over family, colleagues getting physically sick and ill because of stress, colleagues crying while at work because of the stress, colleagues shooting out emails at midnight, 1am, 2am, 3am. It is absolutely ridiculous and something needs to change. 2) Poor management. I think the issue is that, a majority of people love Google because they get to work on interesting technical problems - and these are the people that see little value in learning how to develop emotional intelligence. Perhaps they enjoy technical problems because people are too "difficult." People are promoted into management positions - not because they actually know how to lead/manage, but because they happen to be smart or because there is no other path to grow into. So there is a layer of intelligent individuals who are horrible managers and leaders. Yet, there is no value system to actually do anything about that because "emotional intelligence" or "adaptive leadership" are not taken seriously. 3) Jerks. Sure, there are a lot of brilliant people - but, sadly, there are also a lot of jerks (and, many times, they are one and the same). Years ago, that wasn't the case. I don't know if the pool of candidates is getting smaller, or maybe all the folks with great personalities cashed out and left, or maybe people are getting burned out and it's wearing on their personality and patience. I've heard stories of managers straight-up cussing out their employees and intimidating/scaring their employees into compliance. 4) It's a giant company now and, inevitably, it has become slower moving and is now layered with process and bureaucracy. So many political battles, empire building, territory grabbing. Google says, "Don't be evil." But, that practice doesn't seem to be put into place when it comes to internal practices. :(

3865
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All