employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Atomics

Is this your company?

Proceed with caution - Engineer IV General Atomics Employee Review

1.0
Aug 20, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits (healthcare, pension, 9/80 schedule) Nice office space

Cons

Very poor management/leadership Terrible communication both within and across departments HR does not deal with problem employees even after multiple reports (true for verbally abuse, extremely poor work ethic (sleeping at work, improper labor accounting), and generally inappropriate behavior) No empowerment of employees No employee training Minimal opportunities for career growth

avatar
General Atomics Response
7y
We take what you’re describing very seriously—and we hope you brought your concerns to your supervisor and followed up if the problems were persisting. We are always working to improve our communication channels.

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All