Slowly sinking ship - Software Engineer DrFirst Employee Review

1.0
Jun 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- remote work - pay was decent

Cons

Direction is sorely lacking and management is constantly getting in each other's way as well as are just out of their depth. The flagship product for the company went 2 years without a major update because of an ego contest between upper management. Technology overall is sorely outdated and impossible to update because technical leadership is either completely non-technical or focused on minimizing cost at the expense of literally everything else. It's an HR company masquerading as a tech company.

avatar
DrFirst Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We appreciate you taking the time to highlight both the positive aspects, such as remote work and decent pay, as well as the areas where you feel we need improvement. We are truly sorry to hear about your concerns regarding our direction, management, and product. We recognize the importance of strong leadership and effective communication in driving the company forward, and we are actively working to address these issues. We are committed to evolving and improving, and your feedback is a crucial part of that process. If you have any specific suggestions or would like to discuss your concerns further, please feel free to reach out to us directly at hrsupport@drfirst.com. Thank you again for your honesty and for contributing to our growth.

Explore other reviews about DrFirst

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great experience, team, and opportunity

Cons

None as of yet, have not been here long enough

2.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Remote Work - Cool tech stack - Some great individual contributors

Cons

Personally, I definitely had a '1 star' worthy experience at DrFirst due to the toxicity of the leadership I interacted with. However, I was hesitant to actually rate DrFirst as a '1 star' here since my experience was limited to the cyber security team, and I don't think it's fair to suggest that all of the various teams within DrFirst are the same way. In my situation, I first encountered some of this toxicity on my 4th day at the company - where I was pulled into a 1 on 1 with senior security leadership, who proceeded to go on somewhat of a tangent about previous security personnel at DrFirst who they had terminated, and explicitly told me they had a '3 strike policy' and suggested they had no problem letting me go in the event I reached this ambiguous '3 strike' threshold (which was never defined). It's worth mentioning that I'm very aware that if someone doesn't do their job > they will eventually get terminated, that's a pretty widely accepted notion. But hearing these comments just 4 days after starting was pretty shocking. I was hoping this was somewhat of a one-off too, but this kind of language and management style that I perceived as heavily focused on termination risk and negative consequences rather than coaching and development persisted in just about every 1 on 1 over the course of the next month, which led me to realize I should probably get out sooner rather than later. In addition to some of this behavior directed towards me, senior security leadership would also regularly make questionable/not-so-positive comments in passing about broader company leadership (e.g., technology leadership) - in our 1 on 1s. I wasn't sure how to respond to some of these comments, but they were also somewhat of a theme in a lot of our 1 on 1 interactions. Another kind of crazy thing I experienced while at DrFirst was security leadership's use of Claude. I'm very pro-AI in the workplace setting (especially in the security engineering setting), but the way in which security leadership would try and leverage Claude and interpret Claude output was pretty shocking. In one instance, a security concern was escalated (by senior security leadership) based largely on Claude output. After additional investigation by individual contributors on the team, the issue was determined not to be a real security incident and appeared to stem from a misunderstanding of the model's output. That experience raised concerns for me about how AI-generated information was being evaluated before operational decisions were made and was just generally pretty wild to witness first-hand because of how trivial the hallucination was to decipher once individual contributors on the team actually saw what was going on. So, take the 'AI-first' attitude that is advertised with a grain of salt, as some of what is actually going on behind the scenes is kind of wonky. I want to emphasize one more time that I don't think my experience at DrFirst represents the company at large, and that I think there are tons of great individual contributors at DrFirst. My immediate counterparts on the security team were genuinely awesome to work with (veryyy smart and kind people), and my encounters with HR, IT, and other teams at the company were also really positive. Unfortunately, the immediate security leadership (composed of 1 VP at the time of posting) made my time here pretty unbearable, which resulted in me accepting an offer at another firm just 6 weeks after my first day.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All