DTCC casts off talent and advances mediocrity. - Senior Credit Risk Analyst DTCC Employee Review

1.0
Mar 4, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None that spring to mind

Cons

Management has no clear direction and frequently changes course. Micro-management is endemic. Technology is about 20 years behind the times often making the job impossible. People with ideas are seen as a threat. People management does not seem to be required of any managers. Often multiple levels of approval are required for the simplest of things. Management is always quick to throw people under the bus for mistakes (really overly manual processes from the 70s) but never want to find a solution.

Explore other reviews about DTCC

5.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fast pace lots of learning opportunities, very supportive management great co-workers.

Cons

Sometimes too many meetings to get in the way to get the job done.

4.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Internal Audit's work is meaningful and provides strong exposure across risk, technology and operations. Audits tend to focus on areas that truly matter from a regulatory and risk perspective, so you're not just checking boxes. There is a genuinely strong team culture. Colleagues are competent, collaborative, and willing to help, with a good mix of experience levels that make it a solid environment for learning. There is also clear investment in employee development. Managers often have regular career discussions, and there are ongoing efforts around training, including newer areas like AI tools and capabilities. Recognition is present, and people are generally acknowledged for strong performance. Overall, it's a strong place to build audit fundamentals, gain exposure to innovation initiatives, and develop credibility within financial services / internal audit.

Cons

Internal Audit's workload is consistently high, not just during peak periods. It's common to juggle multiple audits with overlapping deadlines, alongside continuous monitoring and other responsibilities, which can make it difficult at times. Processes can be very documentation heavy and sometimes feel rigid, which is expected in a highly regulated environment but can reduce efficiency. A significant amount of time can go into formatting, reviewing and aligning work papers to methodology. Some workflows remain manual, which adds to the overall pressure and limit efficiency.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All