employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Computer Integrated Services

Is this your company?

Great Growth & Challenges - Manager Computer Integrated Services Employee Review

4.0
Mar 14, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Since I joined CIS there has been changes of staff, but good changes to better service our clients. Many inexperienced or disgruntled employees are no longer with the firm. We are now hiring professionals that not only have the technical skills, but also the professionalism to provide world class service to our clients. Opportunities to learn and support different technologies and clients. Work with experienced and great Engineers/Techs. Many employees have been working at CIS for a minimum of 15 years.

Cons

Work-Life balance could be better. Communication can improve particularly from the sales to the services team.

Explore other reviews about Computer Integrated Services

5.0
Sep 23, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very nice place to learn

Cons

Lot of experience to gain

1.0
Apr 6, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The technical team was dedicated, capable, and committed to delivering high‑quality service. Over time, the organization implemented a modernized IT stack, strong automation, and standardized processes that enabled a small team to consistently meet SLAs. There were opportunities to build systems from the ground up, modernize infrastructure, and introduce operational discipline where little previously existed.

Cons

There was limited organizational alignment between technical operations and sales. Standardization and automation—key drivers of service quality and efficiency—were not consistently supported or fully understood outside the technical team. Investment in training, particularly for sales and go‑to‑market functions, was minimal, which made it challenging to clearly communicate and sell the company’s offerings. As a result, new client acquisition was inconsistent despite strong service delivery. Leadership changes did not materially improve cross‑functional alignment, long‑term planning, or investment in people. Decision‑making was often short‑term and budget‑driven, even when proposals were aimed at improving sustainability and growth.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All