employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Computer Integrated Services

Is this your company?

Awful place - Stay away - Anonymous employee Computer Integrated Services Employee Review

1.0
Jan 30, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros to this clown act.

Cons

They lost most of their newly acquired clients which caused them to lose money. There is very high turnover, they hire and fire workers constantly because they are struggling to profit and provide quality service at the same time which should be the cornerstone of any business. They claim its "all about the client" but it really about their bottom line, the quality of their service is extremely lacking because they try to struggle for a profit by hiring inexperienced workers for less. Another motto of theirs: " We offer careers, not jobs"

Explore other reviews about Computer Integrated Services

5.0
Sep 23, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very nice place to learn

Cons

Lot of experience to gain

1.0
Apr 6, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The technical team was dedicated, capable, and committed to delivering high‑quality service. Over time, the organization implemented a modernized IT stack, strong automation, and standardized processes that enabled a small team to consistently meet SLAs. There were opportunities to build systems from the ground up, modernize infrastructure, and introduce operational discipline where little previously existed.

Cons

There was limited organizational alignment between technical operations and sales. Standardization and automation—key drivers of service quality and efficiency—were not consistently supported or fully understood outside the technical team. Investment in training, particularly for sales and go‑to‑market functions, was minimal, which made it challenging to clearly communicate and sell the company’s offerings. As a result, new client acquisition was inconsistent despite strong service delivery. Leadership changes did not materially improve cross‑functional alignment, long‑term planning, or investment in people. Decision‑making was often short‑term and budget‑driven, even when proposals were aimed at improving sustainability and growth.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All