Positive outlook, not for everyone - Manager Array (NY) Employee Review

3.0
May 8, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fully remote Good pay and benefits 6 month reviews - opportunity for exponential career growth Open rein to try new things, new processes, and build so long as you have the A/B test data to backup your plan(s) and you own outcomes.

Cons

Two formal layoffs in 2023, hurt trust and culture. Struggles with ongoing voluntary attrition and poorly calibrated hiring process to backfill. Some are doing the work of 2-3 people, capacity is limited. No structure or general delegation of authority beyond the CEO. Conflicting environment, ostensibly trying to grow and scale to enterprise readiness while simultaneously accepting that a lack of structure will persist. Difficult to know who to trust.

Explore other reviews about Array (NY)

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Cons

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Cons

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All