employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Amazon Web Services

Part of Amazon

Is this your company?

If you're below L10, you're one of the poors - Sr. Software Engineer Amazon Web Services Employee Review

3.0
Feb 18, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- There exist good people who work at Amazon if you can find them - Is so wildly chaotic and disorganized that they effectively recreate natural selection, making them resilient to outside forces.

Cons

- Pays less than other big tech - Is "mandate" driven, even if it results in terrible decisions - RTO is a big pile of suck - Has some extremely toxic people - The "sociopath executive game of thrones" is readily on display. No attempt to hide it. - Prides itself in its objectivity while engaging in bad-faith interpretations of incomplete data - L5 and L4 tech jobs are an on-call meat grinder; it's easier to carry a pager than it is to build automation - Relies on a form of trauma bonding between team members by creating a common "enemy" (executive leadership) - In the past 24 months of employment, 13 of those months were 100-hour work weeks.

Explore other reviews about Amazon Web Services

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great job. I’ve learned so much it is just hard with 5 day rto

Cons

The 5 day RTO mandate

4.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Operated in systems that had real scale, operational constraints, and production consequences.

Cons

Working at Amazon Web Services gave me strong exposure to distributed systems, operational ownership, and production-scale infrastructure, but there were definitely tradeoffs as well. One downside was that, like many large organizations, ownership could become fragmented. You often own a subsystem or workflow rather than an entire product end-to-end, which can limit exposure to broader architectural decision-making unless you deliberately seek it out. There was also significant process overhead. Design reviews, operational processes, dependency coordination, and organizational alignment were valuable for learning rigor, but they can slow iteration compared to smaller engineering teams. Another challenge is that large internal ecosystems can abstract away infrastructure complexity. AWS has extensive internal tooling, deployment systems, and operational platforms, which are powerful, but some of that experience does not transfer directly outside the company. I also found that operational work could dominate engineering time at points. Handling production issues, retries, integration failures, and on-call responsibilities teaches reliability engineering well, but it can reduce the amount of time spent on deeper technical exploration or greenfield development. Finally, there is the perception aspect. AWS is a strong name, but experienced interviewers know there is wide variance between teams and roles. The company name opens doors, but ultimately you still need to demonstrate technical depth, ownership, and strong engineering judgment independently of the brand.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All