employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Center for Open Science

Is this your company?

Center for Open Science Reviews

3.6

63% would recommend to a friend

(17 total reviews)

Brian Nosek

61% approve of CEO

45% positive business outlook

Center for Open Science has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 17 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Center for Open Science employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

17 reviews
2.0
Apr 20, 2015

Not recommended, especially for diverse hires

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great team, very friendly and helpful coworkers, great location, free lunch twice a week, modern office with lots of light. There are some project managers coming on board, which may mitigate some of the cons.

Cons

The cofounders have never run a company before, and it shows. One of them has published research on unconscious bias, including in hiring, and his experience should have helped the company build more diversity by now; but he won't step in and get his partner to stop policing the diverse hires harder than the white guys--his partner's bad behavior has already chased off two full-time female developers (out of a total of four), plus who knows how many interns. Aside from his anti-diversity issues, the techier of the founders also can't let go of control enough to let his employees do the work they're hired for. He micromanages everything from onboarding junior developers to architecture decisions (this, he does well) to fine-grained development decisions about the software. If he would step back and stop constantly changing project priorities, people would get the same amount done, better, with higher morale and more time away from the office. As another commenter mentioned, almost the entire development team is young, first job out of college, and the interns outnumber the full-time employees, especially in the summer. So there's an undercurrent of hard-drinking, hard-partying that not everyone would appreciate. The salaries here are significantly lower than market rate (it's a non-profit), and the hours are long; my theory is that most of the development team doesn't know they have the option to be treated better and paid better elsewhere, and that's why they stay.

1.0
Oct 10, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free lunch on Tuesday. Mostly great colleagues. Starting pay is usually fair (but doesn't increase).

Cons

We are an excuse factory with no real leadership. We spend all of our time making excuses for why we didn't accomplish anything or why we can't try something new, rather than coming up with creative solutions or letting our talented staff try to solve an issue without being micromanaged. All of our ambitious and creative people have been reduced to a depressing state and it shows through poor attendance at work, even including happy hour, and our record rate of attrition. Everyone is bored and looking for a new challenge, but there are none here, so people are going elsewhere. Next Friday is the last day for 3 people who just resigned, and we only have about 40 people on staff. I should also mention that we rarely refill positions, we just overload others to save money (without giving raises, of course). Looking for a mentor or professional development? Forget about it. We have been fighting for that for several years and have received nothing. As with everything else, these requests are continually deferred until we are 100% certain of something. Certain of what, nobody knows. How you can ever be 100% certain in business, nobody knows either. Looking to help grow a company, who will also reward you for your ambition and successes? Forget about it. "Leadership" will gladly accept your successes to claim as their own, but you will not get recognition, appreciation, or a compensation increase. These requests are indefinitely deferred as well. I could go on, but the thought of it just bores me even more.

2.0
Jul 3, 2023

Run like an academic sweat shop

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Relatively flexible work days. They know how to hire really smart and capable individuals. Decent mission. Very good benefits

Cons

Management - no one there knows how to manage people. Gaslighting is the preferred management approach Support younger scholars not by scaring them, but by giving them the tools they need to succeed. Diversity and equality are words they like to use, but actions they do not actively support.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 17 Reviews

Glassdoor has 36 Center for Open Science reviews submitted anonymously by Center for Open Science employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Center for Open Science is right for you.