1st interview was a standard one; meeting the editor to discuss what the role entailed, and what they were expecting. All cordial and straightforward enough. Asked to write a couple of pieces for the editor to look over (700 words in total).
2nd interview involved a chat with the editor and owner of the company, going over more or less what was covered first tme around, as well as a short critique on samples.
Came away with a sense it was a good place to learn and develop. Was told I'd hear back from them before the week was over, which due to other potential commitments would have suited. Didn't respond until early the week after, and with a quick and generic rejection. Despite attempted follow-ups on my part, communication ceased from there.
Having spent the money and time to make the journey through London twice (not to mention the homework that was set), I would have thought I'd get a bit more back than that, whether it's a reimbursement for train tickets or even a comment on what I lacked and maybe could have worked on for future interviews.
So, though the editor was pleasant to chat with, and seemed like she was a pleasure to work with, the real problem here was the severe lack of post-interview communication, which spoilt the whole process, really.
