I applied online. I interviewed at Revolut in May 2025
Interview
Stages: HR → 2 Technical → System Design → 3 Team Fit rounds
Technical Rounds: The Reasonable Part
The actual technical interviews were solid and fair. System design was standard for the level. No complaints here - this is how technical interviews should be conducted.
---
Team Fit: Where Things Got Creative
Round 1: Team A - The Trust Issues Edition
Started normally with behavioral questions, then suddenly turned into an interrogation. The interviewer seemed convinced I was fabricating my experience and began re-asking technical questions from previous rounds ("How exactly do you guarantee exactly-once delivery?"). Apparently, working 3-5 years ago requires forensic-level memory of database status values. The passive-aggressive undertone was... palpable.
Round 2: Team B - The Coordinated Rejection
Two weeks later...
Different team, same tribe, but apparently communication flows freely between teams. Opened with "So you already failed one, but apparently you know how to pass interviews" and wrapped up in 15 minutes. Efficient, I'll give them that.
Round 3: Team C - The Microservices Philosophy Exam
Another week passes...
Completely different tribe this time, yet somehow they also needed their own assessment. Because apparently surviving two team fits from different teams isn't enough data - they needed a third opinion on why I chose microservices architecture. At this point, I was genuinely curious about their decision-making process and wondering if there's a fourth tribe waiting in the wings. And interviewer had been working less than a year in the company.
---
The "Challenge" Question Backfire
When I asked about their biggest technical challenges last year, the answer was enlightening: "We deployed a bug to production that wasn't caught in staging." Truly groundbreaking stuff. Really makes you wonder what kind of entrepreneurial genius they're expecting to hire for a senior role.
---
The One-Way Street
The entire process felt like a job application to an exclusive club rather than a mutual evaluation. They expect you to be thrilled by the opportunity while showing minimal interest in what you might bring to the table. Classic symptoms of a company that believes their paycheck grants them unlimited interview creativity.
Final Thoughts
After a month-long process, they ghost you. No feedback, no closure - just silence. Professional courtesy apparently doesn't scale with valuation.
Advice for future candidates: Prepare your "Why Revolut?" speech, brush up on microservices philosophy, and maybe practice remembering database schemas from your previous jobs. Oh, and bring extra patience - you'll need it.
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Revolut
Interview
The experience was disappointing and reflected a lack of professionalism.
The interaction gave the impression of a disorganised or potentially unhealthy work culture.
Answered most of the questions accurately and to the best of my ability.
The interview was initially scheduled for a short time slot. Toward the end, the interviewer asked for my availability and indicated that they would schedule a follow-up session to continue the discussion. However, no further communication or follow-up was received.
I applied online. The process took 5 days. I interviewed at Revolut in May 2026
Interview
During the initial HR screening call, the recruiter explicitly stated that Revolut was not hiring for a specific team and that team fit would be determined only after the coding and system design stages.
However, after passing the screening, I received the following rejection message: “After carefully reviewing your experience, we've decided to move forward with candidates whose profiles more closely align with the specific requirements of the role. Please note that this decision is based on current team needs.”
This creates a clear inconsistency in the communication. If team allocation and specific requirements were to be evaluated only in later technical rounds, a rejection citing “current team needs” right after screening appears contradictory. Such practices can lead to candidates investing time in the interview process based on incomplete or misleading information at the early stage.
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Revolut (Dubai) in May 2026
Interview
Interview begins with recruiter calling, explaining you the process
- Coding round
- System Design
- Hiring Manager round
- Bar raiser round
Each rounds are qualifier to another round. I did the coding round and system design, and I was ruled out
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
Coding round for the Matrix grid problem for 60 min coding round
First Part of the problem
- Randomly fills a matrix (a * b) with 5 'x' alphabet, reset would be 'o' alphabet
Second part of the problem (minesweeper game on Windows OS)
- Given a matrix fill with 'x', find number of minds adjacent to it
You need to solve both problems in 40 mins to qualify (First 10 mins Introduction, last 10 minutes is follow-up question)
Remember to ask follow-up questions else it mark as candidate isn't proactive in asking questions
2. System Design Round (90 mins)
They ask to design an internal developer portal that establishes a fully automated, version-control CI/CD pipeline at scale.
It basically involves designing the Internal developer, I started with requirements, non-funtional requirements, entities in system, I started with API design but they said it's okay to skip, and high level design.
I started with Component-Based Design where I drawn frontend, CLI, API Gateway, catalog services, ... and all other components of the developer portal
But they were interested in detailed CI/CD pipeline steps. This is where I screwed up; I caught the hint much later in the interview when there were 10 mins left, and I quickly drawn CI pipeline and a CD pipeline, but wasn't able to explain each step in the CD pipeline in detail.
They wanted a more comprehensive Workflow and Operational design of CI/CD pipeline instead of a component-based design of the internal developer portal.
Since I didn't complete the design, I was ruled out of the interview