Thank you for your detailed feedback on our interview process. It's great to hear that you found the structure encompassing a broad range of relevant areas. We acknowledge your point regarding the similarity between the online assessment and the technical interview. The intention behind this design is to ensure a consistent, comprehensive evaluation of technical skills, allowing candidates to demonstrate their abilities in both a self-guided and an interactive environment. However, we understand this approach might feel repetitive and overlook the opportunity to explore a candidate's unique experiences and problem-solving methods in greater depth. Our goal is to not only assess technical proficiency but also to gain a better understanding of a candidate's thought process, creativity, and ability to apply their knowledge to real-world problems. We believe in fostering a dialogue where candidates can share more about their work, the challenges they've faced, and how they've overcome them rather than focusing solely on technical testing. Furthermore, we appreciate your note on using resources like Google during the interview. This policy aims to mimic real-world scenarios where problem-solving often involves researching and applying information. However, we also want to ensure that this practice doesn't detract from the assessment's integrity or from evaluating a candidate's ability to think critically and solve problems independently. We're committed to making our interview process as effective, fair, and enjoyable as possible for all candidates. Your feedback is crucial for us in this ongoing process, and we're grateful for the opportunity to improve. If you have any further suggestions or want to discuss your experience, please don't hesitate to reach out. We value open communication and always look for ways to better align our process with the needs and expectations of our candidates.