I received an interview call from ixigo, which involved two technical rounds. The first round was focused on my resume and system design, where I received average feedback. In the second round, which was focused on DSA, the interviewer asked two LeetCode-style questions. I provided both non-optimal and optimal solutions for both, with the optimal ones having O(n) time complexity—something I had already solved on LeetCode. However, the interviewer seemed to have a different approach in mind, and gave me a test case, expecting my solution to fail. After dry-running it, I was confident it would pass, and later I verified it on LeetCode post-interview, where it worked as expected. It felt like the interviewer was not fully up to the mark in terms of understanding the solution

it was an on campus opportunity. first round was consist of 2 section, first section aptitude mcq second section tecnical mcq then second round was tecnical round mostly there was 2 medium level coding question were asked. they expect the most optimum solution from you