The Telephone call with the HR was great.. all went well.. the task is pretty much good and nice.. not easy not hard. i finished it in 5 hours approx.. then the feedback came after 10 days .. with 4 comments from the (Expert) pointing to some "typos" in my code.. I mean this was the worst interviewing process I saw yet and literally can damage an average person self esteem , to make a no-go and reject someone over typos and small mistakes and let go the whole effort that makes me avoid you again for the rest of my life . but well that's not surprising for a company that makes big effort to make the chicken taste bad. :) common guys. checkin are straight forward and did no typos to torture it that much .. even my son can make chicken taste better :) anyway.. if you want to take the risk of someone rejecting you over some "Typos" .. be my guest .. but don't beat your self up..

A very negative experience. It all started when the company tried to hire me through an outsourcing firm, which took me two calls (screening and technical) and I never received any feedback on them. Then I received an invitation directly, but the engineer didn’t show up for the call (they contacted me the next day). After that, they quickly scheduled four more calls for me (experience, live coding, architectural, and behavioral) and tried to lower my grade during the process. I want to note that I was impressed by the level of the questions and the technical interviewers; however, at the same time, HR made a mistake twice and sent the wrong time for the call, and the manager was 10 minutes late for the final call even after I warned them. In the end, I was rejected without receiving detailed feedback while the actual interview went well. I liked the technical staff, but there are issues on the management side—most likely related to budgets and planning.