Product Manager applicants have rated the interview process at Fever with 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 100% positive. To compare, the company-average is 66.7% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Product Manager roles take an average of 30 days to get hired, when considering 1 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Fever overall takes an average of 25 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Fever as a Product Manager according to 1 Glassdoor interviews include:
IQ intelligence test: 20%
Group panel interview: 20%
Phone interview: 20%
One on one interview: 20%
Presentation: 20%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 7 weeks. I interviewed at Fever in May 2026
Interview
the process was quite fast. It lasted 53 days since the day I send the application until the rejection and in between the 4 interviews. Out of the 4 interviews, 2 of them with peer product managers seem to be very unprepared when it come to the questions, they even ask me to mention the red flags of my current company which I found a bit odd.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
- something I work on With impact
- how do i decide when to stop iterating and go to the next thing
- How would I decide what to do if the company wouldn’t have clear vision, let’s say I need to decide between increasing cr vs increase aov (a lot of emphasis on defining vision)
- If I have use ai
- Why I’m still in product, what motivates me
Long! Six rounds with phone screens, psychometric testing, case interviews, all before meeting anyone I’d potentially work with. Talent Acquisition was quick to respond, kind, and professional, but for the process felt long winded and excessive.
Primero te hacen una entrevista tipo screening con HR. Todo Ok. Pero después te piden hacer el test Mercer Mettl que dura una hora para medir razonamiento abstracto, matemático y verbal. El test es innecesariamente difícil y no tiene nada que ver con el rol. Si no llegas al puntaje te rechazan de inmediato. No analizan ni siquiera tu potencial por experiencia. Eso es lo que le debería de importar a la empresa si de verdad buscan talento, no un test estilo años 90s obsoleto. Encima la vacante dice que un master es un plus y el sueldo no es nada competitivo. Una decepción. Y todavía te dicen que por favor apliques a más vacantes… así quien querría aplicar? Sabiendo que tienen este tipo de sistemas donde evalúan de forma tan obsoleta y subjetiva?