I’ve interviewed with Elemica twice—once in the summer of 2024 and again in February 2026—both times through the same internal referral. Unfortunately, both experiences highlighted consistent issues with communication, transparency, and process.
In 2024, I interviewed for a Client Success role. During that process, I had a poor experience with the hiring manager, who has since left the company. When I re-engaged with Elemica in 2026, I discussed that experience with the recruiter and was told that Client Success roles were no longer part of their structure.
In February 2026, I applied for a Project Manager position. The recruiter initially reached out, noted they were looking to hire quickly, and asked for my availability that same week to meet with the hiring manager. I provided multiple time options but received no follow-up.
After I followed up, I was informed the salary range was below my expectations and asked if I would still be interested. I confirmed that I was, given my strong interest in gaining SAP-related experience. I was then told to “stay tuned 🙂” — however, a week later I received a generic rejection email stating they had moved forward with an internal candidate.
To further demonstrate my alignment and initiative, I independently created a portfolio project simulating SAP S/4HANA onboarding, along with a structured Jira board to illustrate how the implementation and onboarding workflow would be managed end-to-end. Despite this effort, there was no opportunity to present or discuss this work.
Shortly after this rejection, the same recruiter posted a Customer Success Representative role on LinkedIn—despite previously stating that Client Success roles were no longer part of the organization. Given my prior experience and continued interest, I reached out and was told the role was below my salary expectations but that a conversation could be considered. After expressing openness, I again experienced delayed and inconsistent follow-up, ultimately being told they were near offer stage with another candidate.
Additionally, I was informed that no roles are currently posted due to an ATS transition, yet multiple older job postings (4–6 months old) remain visible online, which can be misleading for candidates.
Overall, the process felt disjointed, with conflicting information, lack of follow-through, and limited transparency. For a company operating in enterprise SaaS and SAP-driven environments, I expected a more structured and candidate-focused hiring experience.
