TryHackMe Reviews

2.8

37% would recommend to a friend

(53 total reviews)

37% positive business outlook

TryHackMe has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 53 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The TryHackMe employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

53 reviews
3.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team is passionate about making cybersecurity education more accessible and engaging.

Cons

The pace of the fully remote environment makes communication challenging. Long decision-making cycles and limited people's availability can create delays between planning and execution. The scope of roles could also evolve beyond the original job description. The hiring process felt quite lightweight and may benefit from clearer alignment between recruitment tasks, advertised responsibilities and the day-to-day realities of the role.

2.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The work itself is genuinely meaningful. TryHackMe sits in an important space — accessible, practical cybersecurity education — and for a while, it felt like a place where real expertise was valued. The people on the ground, across content, engineering, and beyond, are among the sharpest and most dedicated professionals I've worked with. The annual retreat was a genuine highlight, and the early culture of idea-sharing and growth felt real. If you are given the latitude to do your job, you can build impressive things here.

Cons

That latitude quietly disappears. Over time, the environment shifts from "we value your expertise" to something far more controlled and far less honest. Expectations escalate without corresponding support, resources, or recognition. When things go wrong, accountability moves in one direction only — downward. Leadership's relationship with feedback is performative. Concerns are heard, acknowledged, and filed away. Nothing structurally changes. Goalposts move. Verbal promises are seldom honoured in practice. For anyone used to working in an environment where commitment means something, this is deeply frustrating. The co-founder dynamic is a known issue at this point, and the recent reviews on here reflect what many of us have observed for some time: aggressive messaging, inconsistent treatment depending on whether you're currently in favour, and a communication style that would not survive scrutiny in a professionally governed organisation. Senior people who push back or set boundaries do not tend to stay long — whether by choice or otherwise. The pattern is consistent and well-documented at this point: people who push back, set limits, or stop being convenient are quietly removed. It does not matter how strong their output is or how long they have been there. When the wind changes, it changes fast — and the process used to move people out is dressed up in language that obscures what is actually happening. The talent at this company is exceptional. It is being wasted.

1.0
Mar 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company operates fully online, and the people you work with on a daily basis are amazing and exceptional. In the beginning, the platform's vision and mission to help the next generation learn about cybersecurity were truly amazing.

Cons

Most of the content now is AI made, lowering the value of the platform content. The work culture is deeply unhealthy, leading to severe burnout and exhaustion. Due to lack of employees protection laws, the work culture tends to overwork employees in third world countries. The founder promotes a "founder mode" that translates to extreme micromanagement of both minor design choices and major strategic decisions. Employees are routinely overworked, underpaid relative to their hours, and expected to be present on Slack after hours. Furthermore, there is severe operational negligence in HR, including payroll and tax errors that resulted in UK employees unexpectedly owing thousands of pounds. Even worse is the deceptive behavior from leadership regarding ethical data usage. When concerns were raised internally and publicly about user data being used to train this new AI agent, the founder labeled these concerns "misinformation" and explicitly claimed that no TryHackMe data was being used. In direct contradiction to this, the new AI agent's website actively boasts that it uses "millions of user journeys from TryHackMe" to train its model. When community members express discomfort with this, leadership's response has been defensive, with the founder simply telling concerned users to delete their accounts and blocking critics on LinkedIn. Internally, this dismissiveness is mirrored in how staff are treated. Anyone who attempts to set healthy boundaries or maintain a work-life balance is quietly managed out of the company. The founder actively boasts about this intense, fast-paced culture in blogs, attempting to disguise a toxic work environment and 70-hour work weeks as "ambition"

Viewing 1 - 3 of 53 Reviews

Glassdoor has 58 TryHackMe reviews submitted anonymously by TryHackMe employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if TryHackMe is right for you.