Sequoia Reviews

3.0

41% would recommend to a friend

(393 total reviews)
avatar

Greg Golub

39% approve of CEO

36% positive business outlook

Sequoia has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 393 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Sequoia employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

393 reviews
5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Came in as an intern and later converted to full-time. The biggest plus is that you're not treated like "just an intern" expectations are real, and so is the learning. You get exposure to actual work early on, which helps you understand what the role really demands. The team is generally helpful, but you're also expected to take ownership of your work and figure things out. If you're someone who learns by doing, this environment works well. The conversion felt fair and based on performance, which gives you clarity on what matters. Overall, it helped me transition from an academic mindset to a more practical, execution-focused approach.

Cons

There isn't always a clear step-by-step structure, so initially it can feel like you're connecting the dots yourself. Not a dealbreaker, but something to be aware of.

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As a Director in Product Security, you get a genuine opportunity to shape the company’s security-first culture at scale. Leadership is increasingly aligned on the importance of embedding security early in the product lifecycle, and there is clear executive sponsorship for key initiatives. The role offers high visibility and cross-functional influence, especially working with engineering, product, and compliance teams. The organization is investing in modern security practices like shift-left security, AppSec automation, and threat modeling, which makes the work both meaningful and future-ready. There’s also noticeable progress in hiring strong technical talent and empowering teams to take ownership. For leaders who enjoy building programs from the ground up, this is a great environment with minimal bureaucracy and good momentum.

Cons

Like many fast-evolving orgs, processes are still maturing. There can be occasional ambiguity in priorities and resource allocation, especially when balancing speed and security. Some teams are still on the journey of fully integrating security practices into their workflows. Tooling and infrastructure, while improving, may require further consolidation to increase efficiency at scale.

4.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High visibility into quality strategy and direct engagement with leadership Opportunity to influence QA frameworks, automation maturity, and release governance Strong cross-functional collaboration across Product, Engineering, and Program teams Increasing focus on quality-first mindset and scalable testing practices

Cons

Some QA processes are still evolving and lack full standardization across teams Dependency on multiple stakeholders can occasionally impact release timelines Tooling and automation maturity varies across functions

Viewing 1 - 3 of 393 Reviews

Glassdoor has 441 Sequoia reviews submitted anonymously by Sequoia employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Sequoia is right for you.