Level Data Reviews

3.1

50% would recommend to a friend

(28 total reviews)

Gary Fortier

32% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

Level Data has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 28 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Level Data employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

28 reviews
1.0
Oct 28, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Engineers and other folks outside of management are great. Product managers are great and easy to work with.

Cons

I want to caveat this review with saying it is only applicable to the engineering management layer at Level Data. I don't have enough knowledge of the other departments within Level Data, and the actual engineers themselves at Level Data are very intelligent, great people. It is only the management side that is an absolute mess. We started doing daily stand ups with a 3 developer team. There were multiple VP-level people, director level folks, and product manager on these stand ups. Six total management level people in every daily stand up, on a THREE developer team. Let that sink in. Think management bureaucracy similar to what one would see in Office Space. Only the product manager had any business being in our stand ups. She was great and easy to work with, and our productivity showed that. The new VP-level management would preach for developers (including myself) to trust the new processes being put in place. During stand ups, it was a regular occurrence for the director or VPs to pop in late or sporadically, re-iterate what we had already discussed when they weren't there (because they showed up late), and have the audacity to override the meeting and interrupt my team CONSTANTLY while the developers would try to give an update. As the tech lead for the big selling product, this enraged me. I tried to subtly hint numerous times that we had already discussed this or that item, or we were already planning on doing this or that. But what you see a lot from engineering management is very little listening, lots of talking, lots of heavy opinions. So if I am to "trust" this new process, you need to trust the team to do their job and get things done. I found it incredibly frustrating that the director of engineering had no problem constantly interrupting me or my team and overriding decisions. For a bit, I tried to give him benefit of doubt and just assumed that was an unintentionally abrasive personality trait. However, I noticed he never did those things to VP and up level folks, and that's when I realized he and the other engineering VP-level folks applied respect to people on a case-by-case basis based upon corporate ladder rank instead of also having a mutual respsect for their direct reports. Let me share what you can look forward to as a developer. When updating your user story, you might get reprimanded for putting discussions in a comment thread to the user story instead of adding it as a bullet point list in the user story description. So silly. I had another situation where I gave the director a heads up that I would be out during lunch and he told me to put it on the calendar. I did so, and put "Away" or something like that for the calendar event. He reprimanded me for that, saying it should say "Out of Office" or something to that degree, for the 1.5 hours during lunch I was away. And if your first thought is "Wow shouldn't these management folks have better things to do?". YES. You're absolutely right. And that's just my most recent memory in the last couple weeks, there's been plenty annoying, overbearing ticky-tacky things like that in the past. After management basically derailed our sprint planning, they completely killed our productivity and tried to run things with a bullying/dominant style that I'm not a fan of. I believe you should treat all folks, including direct reports, with the same respect and try to bring a positive vibe to the team you're in. Trying to run a team through intimidation will not achieve those results long-term. The truly ironic thing about this is how heavily opinionated the director and VP folks were on the product we were working on, but they have NO idea how any of it works. If you asked them to just draw a simple four or five box flowchart of any of the product's reports that they have a heavy-handed opinion on processes for, they would have NO IDEA how to do it nor did they ever reach out to have a 1-on-1 with me to understand the intricacies of it in order to enable them to make better judgment calls with the technical direction. When it was my last day, I was trying to help some folks with a sales demo to get a couple issues ironed out in the product and streamline some scripts for doing deployments to make it easier for whomever was going to take it over. Literally, while I was working on changes, and without warning, my access to everything was cut off. I had to reach out to a few folks via my personal phone to let them know "Hey sorry I can't help you get that ironed out since my access was cut out of nowhere" just a little bit before their sales demos. Absolutely crazy. Needless to say, my heart goes out to the actual engineers doing the coding as this new layer of engineering management bureaucracy gets shoveled onto them, because those engineers deserve better.

1.0
Mar 29, 2025

Please Read if Interviewing

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are some great people who work at this company. Some are new but some have been there for years and have a great knowledge base of the products. Unlimited PTO. Remote work. Flexibility.

Cons

There are quite a few - 1. Upon resignation, there was no contact made by HR. No exit interview or survey occurred. There was no announcement to the company or teams that I worked with. This isn't anything new, though. Quite a few people have quit without word and we don't hear about it until way after the fact. But without this interview, there is no opportunity to provide feedback - which I question if they really want in the first place. 2. No bonus. No raise throughout employment even though multiple promises were made from multiple people within a leadership position. 3. The expectation is that this company operates at a high level with an extremely high output but they still operate as a startup. There is a lack of resources available and a lack of growth within teams. 4. Products are being marketed without a full knowledge of the products themselves. They are also being pushed out without any content. Campaigns are planned out within the marketing team but then other campaigns from leadership are requested and spun up very quickly without any real plan or direction just to check a box they feel needs to be checked. 4. One of the companies core beliefs is execute with speed, not perfection. Ok, not terrible. But they take it way too seriously thinking that things can just be done in a couple hours when there are already numerous things running and in play. This creates a lot of confusion and a constant need for pivoting. 5. Rarely are teams on the same page. They may leave Meeting 1 on the same page but then some other meeting happens with only some of the same people attending and then everything changes. Without immediate communicaiton about the changes, things progress and then have to constantly be adjusted or redone. There is a lot of work that is done and rushed that ends up going nowhere because things are constantly changing. 6. A lot of people have a lot of opinions on how things are done. Unfortunately, this is so extreme that this has caused a sense of micromanaging throughout the company. In turn, it makes employees question their ideas, qualifications for the jobs they were hired to do as well as who their true leader is for their team. If you want to get into a role where you are focused and have a clear line of management and direction, then skip Level Data. They are operating as a startup with the expectation of a mid-size company. Bottom line, no matter what you do, it's just never enough.

1.0
May 17, 2024

This place is falling apart

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work is the only good part of this company.

Cons

Matt Betts is no longer the CEO. I never met the guy but imagine he'd be heartbroken to see what a failure this company is today. Gary Fortier is the new CEO and is the biggest problem with his company. I could say many things about what's going wrong with this company. However, I think it's best said by Gary's former company/employees at Ready Education. Go take a look at their Glassdoor reviews. He's running Level Data into the ground the same way he did Ready Education. Everything you read about Ready Education reviews is exactly what’s happening at Level Data. It's scary how similar they are. If you do get a job keep an eye on the celebration station on Slack. It's such a joke, so funny. Gary pressures leadership to post positive messages to make everyone + the investment firm think people are happy and things are going great. I could go on and on about how bad the state of this company is. Just stay away. Only a matter of time before Level Data goes under. Don't waste your time here.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 28 Reviews

Glassdoor has 29 Level Data reviews submitted anonymously by Level Data employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Level Data is right for you.