8 years with ON semiconductor - Design Engineer onsemi Employee Review

4.0
Feb 25, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ON Semiconductor has a stable job environment and is a large financially stable company. Diversification of ON's customer base allows for a balanced portfolio. There are challenging design opportunities that provide ample opportunities to grow as a design engineer. Management supports IP development and publications. Training is also provided when the business climate permits it.

Cons

It's all about the bottom line at ON. This sometimes leads to short sighted decisions that hurt long term performance. Growth in the company comes from acquisitions rather than organic growth. Salaries are decent, but do not keep up with the industry. Opportunities for bonuses are also limited and very subjective.

Explore other reviews about onsemi

5.0
Mar 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company is focused on meaningful, long‑term impact, and you truly feel that the work you do matters—especially given onsemi’s role in power, automotive, and industrial technologies.

Cons

Like many large global companies, alignment across regions and functions can take time.

1.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company offers good pay and benefits. I also had the chance to work with many capable and supportive peers at the same level, which made the day-to-day work more manageable.

Cons

The work environment can feel highly political. The system tends to encourage people to compete or protect themselves instead of collaborating and helping each other succeed. This often creates unnecessary tension between teams and individuals. Local management also needs significant improvement. Instead of helping remove roadblocks and making the work more efficient, they often add extra processes, tasks, and requirements that do not always contribute to the real goal: improving quality and getting meaningful work done. There is a lot of focus on activities that look good on paper, but not enough support for the actual work needed to ensure quality and execution.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All