Micro Management - Nodejs Developer eigital Employee Review

1.0
Oct 15, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary if pkg is good and you'll learn lot of new thi6

Cons

Micro Management via Time doctor Need to fill spreadsheets and if your idle time is more than 15 months per day CEO will scold you in meeting Performance based leaves, if they don't want to give they will decrease the ratings and your payment will be deducted for leaves. Late payment, they are doing bi monthly payments

Explore other reviews about eigital

1.0
Feb 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

work from home, good teammates

Cons

Extremely problematic leadership and management practices. The CEO demonstrates toxic behavior including verbal abuse toward employees. The organization has experienced mass layoffs and lacks fundamental departments – no HR team, no product managers. The CEO personally handles all major decisions. Team leads appear to prioritize their compensation over team welfare, even tolerating abusive treatment from leadership. This creates a culture where colleagues cannot support each other. Zero paid holidays offered. Daily work updates must be submitted via Excel spreadsheets with no proper planning or process – development direction changes based on CEO's whims. Invasive time tracking monitors activity down to the second. If your mouse remains inactive for 15 minutes, you must complete a justification form or lose that day's pay entirely. Work-from-home is the only positive aspect, but it comes with significant trade-offs. I understand compensation matters, but I strongly advise prospective employees to avoid this organization. The work environment is deteriorating rapidly and these conditions are unsustainable.

1.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Communication throughout the project was clear and consistent Requirements were well-defined from the beginning Tasks were completed on time and as expected Smooth collaboration during the project execution

Cons

Feedback and rating did not reflect the actual work delivered Lack of transparency in evaluation criteria No constructive feedback provided to justify the low rating Disconnect between project execution and final review

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All