Females beware - Anonymous employee eGENTIC Employee Review

1.0
Jun 19, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good location and annual staff trip.

Cons

Management didn't act on several incidents of sexual harassment towards females. Boys club culture with minimal females in senior positions. The office is in a good spot however the building is tired and for a period of time there were rats. The company boasts "flexible" working hours however this either means an 8am or 9am start. Management also make a regular habit of secretly checking all Skype messages.

avatar
eGENTIC Response
8y
eGENTIC strongly refutes any suggestion of sexual harrassment or an unsafe work environment for female staff. Approximately 70% of our staff are women and many occupy senior leadership positions. We welcome any potential candidate to get the opinions of these women to make an informed decision. eGENTIC has flexible hours where people can choose to start at 8am, 9am or 10am. Many of our staff greatly appreciate this flexibility so they can maintain a work-life balance! In some cases, some roles must start at certain times due to time-zone considerations. The assertion regarding Skype is completely false and without basis. Yes, the large office building we occupy DID have a rat at one stage. The rodent in question has since moved on to a happier place :)

Explore other reviews about eGENTIC

2.0
Aug 19, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule Work from home options

Cons

Low Pay Low promotion options Managment verbally uses age as a basis for pay

1.0
May 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Cannot think of anything over the last 3 years

Cons

APAC leadership lacks transparency, strategic consistency, and accountability Culture is highly top-down, with excessive power concentrated locally Employees may feel unsafe openly voicing concerns or challenging decisions Poor communication from leadership has repeatedly damaged morale Unrealistic workload expectations without sufficient structural support Decision-making is often inconsistent, with unclear ownership and shifting expectations Internal politics can outweigh performance and merit Recent employee appraisal process was particularly disappointing: what was presented as a fair and transparent scoring framework appeared, in practice, to be heavily influenced by management’s preferred payout decisions rather than genuine employee performance or contribution Final appraisal outcomes often felt predetermined based on budget or leadership(local) preference, rather than reflecting who truly deserved stronger recognition Local management has reportedly deflected responsibility by attributing payout decisions entirely to HQ, creating confusion while avoiding accountability for local advocacy This has led to growing employee distrust in both the appraisal system and leadership integrity High-performing employees may feel undervalued, especially when compensation and recognition seem disconnected from actual results Lack of effective leadership checks and balances further amplifies these issues

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All