Weak Leadership and Toxic Expectations - Anonymous employee eGENTIC Employee Review

1.0
May 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Recognition Depends on Pleasing Management.

Cons

Management style feels very performative rather than effective. The MD frequently messages the team after working hours, seemingly to project a “hardworking” image, but it comes across more as poor time management and lack of boundaries. Leadership presence is also lacking — customer visits often feel like accompanying an inexperienced junior rather than being guided by a confident leader. There is also an unrealistic expectation of zero mistakes from staff, which creates unnecessary pressure and tension. This is a workplace run by humans, not machines. A stronger balance of professionalism, communication, and people management would greatly improve the environment.

Explore other reviews about eGENTIC

2.0
Aug 19, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule Work from home options

Cons

Low Pay Low promotion options Managment verbally uses age as a basis for pay

1.0
May 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Cannot think of anything over the last 3 years

Cons

APAC leadership lacks transparency, strategic consistency, and accountability Culture is highly top-down, with excessive power concentrated locally Employees may feel unsafe openly voicing concerns or challenging decisions Poor communication from leadership has repeatedly damaged morale Unrealistic workload expectations without sufficient structural support Decision-making is often inconsistent, with unclear ownership and shifting expectations Internal politics can outweigh performance and merit Recent employee appraisal process was particularly disappointing: what was presented as a fair and transparent scoring framework appeared, in practice, to be heavily influenced by management’s preferred payout decisions rather than genuine employee performance or contribution Final appraisal outcomes often felt predetermined based on budget or leadership(local) preference, rather than reflecting who truly deserved stronger recognition Local management has reportedly deflected responsibility by attributing payout decisions entirely to HQ, creating confusion while avoiding accountability for local advocacy This has led to growing employee distrust in both the appraisal system and leadership integrity High-performing employees may feel undervalued, especially when compensation and recognition seem disconnected from actual results Lack of effective leadership checks and balances further amplifies these issues

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All