Communications Consultant - Communications Consultant (Marketing Communications) Wellmark Employee Review

1.0
May 31, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice cafe (but overpriced), nice gym (but no time to use it), covered parking.

Cons

Big brother mentality and poor team leadership. The definition of micromanagement exists here. If you make a mistake and take ownership, you are still thrown under the bus and publicly called out in team meetings and emails in order make an example. Staff is oppressed and creative projects are only given to the same few. If you complain about it, things are 10 times worse. Huge turnover in the department since JW joined as a leader. Director once said publicly said her goal was to get rid of any "inherited" staff and to only have a team with those she hired. Staff with 5,10 and 15 years have been forced out and cannot speak the truth in exit interviews if they ever want to work in the field again. Culture is fearful and oppressed.

Explore other reviews about Wellmark

5.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This company lives by its mission. Truly working toward improving overall health of all Iowas and South Dakotans. Spearheading ongoing initiatives to reducing member burden, trying to fill in gaps where rural life creates access burdens, and being engaged with the community.

Cons

Slow change. Many processes created are not open to growth and evolution often being told, that’s how we set it up five years ago and it’s worked fine. Also, inclusive to an extent. There are times where if your beliefs do not align with the majority, specifically related to politics there are opportunities for improvement. As part of a diverse and value driven culture, it’s important to recognize not all beliefs are the same.

2.0
Jan 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Nice facility in the Des Moines office with a beautiful gym. • Strong mission and meaningful work that genuinely motivates many employees • Opportunities to work on complex, large-scale initiatives • Some leaders are supportive and open to collaboration

Cons

• Inconsistent people management and accountability across teams. • Repeated concerns raised by multiple employees are often minimized, which prevents issues from being addressed effectively • Limited follow-through when interpersonal or performance issues are escalated, impacting psychological safety. • SAFe has rollout faced significant challenges, and it created a lot of uncertainty. Many colleagues have expressed concerns about their job security. • Good old boys club on tech side of the house • Rigid RTO mandate has replaced flexibility with monitoring. Despite clear evidence that teams were productive remotely during COVID, time in office is now tracked and reported to execs, reinforcing optics over outcomes

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All