Just pass on this company - Product Designer Weekend Employee Review

1.0
Jun 15, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you’re one of the original employees, you can do basically anything you want, regardless of skill or experience. Any failures are not your fault, and any success absolutely is. So good! If you’re anyone else, though… lol

Cons

Where to even start? Management is worthless. I've never done so much managing upward just to be allowed to do my work, and I can barely get anything done because all of my energy is spent managing upward. Leadership takes all of the credit for any minor accomplishment, but will quickly blame and/or fire people for backward slides in KPI progress that those same people warned about months prior. Leadership has an affinity for PIPs as a way to get rid of employees. Expertise is not valued - there is an assumption that anyone can do everything, and any attempt to defer to a coworker with demonstrable expertise in an area is seen as a personal failing. The company claims to value diversity, equity, and inclusion, but has clear biases in both pay, as well as respect, toward white men, and actively undermines the capacity for parents to engage with their families. Coworkers are pitted against each other, rather than encouraged to collaborate, and managers are quick to blame their reports for failing to complete tasks that they themselves stood in the way of, claiming that leadership had tied their hands.

Explore other reviews about Weekend

5.0
Jan 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Good people and fun atmosphere * Given lots of responsibility and are really allowed to own your work

Cons

* Sometimes engineering leadership is unhelpful and fails to properly guide younger engineers

1.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice office, good people somewhat to work with depending on the team, good work life balance.

Cons

Compensation is significantly below market, with equity offering minimal value. Benefits are lacking, and hiring standards within the engineering team appear low. Engineers are often assigned to unengaging projects, and the codebase reflects substantial technical debt and poor architectural decisions. Team dynamics can be challenging, with strong egos impacting collaboration. Attrition is also notably high, and there is a clear absence of prioritization and transparency.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All