HOSTILE WORKPLACE AS A RESULT OF BAD LEADERSHIP - Product Analyst Ware2Go Employee Review

1.0
Feb 15, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

THERE ARE NOT TOO MANY PROS. MANY EMPLOYEES ARE DEDICATED AND WANT TO DO A GOOD JOB.

Cons

All I can say based on my experience is that this is the worst company to work for. MANAGEMENT IS FULL OF DISRESPECTFUL AND TOXIC PEOPLE. THE WORK ENVIRONMENT IS STRESSFUL AND HOSTILE AS A RESULT OF BAD LEADERSHIP. On top of that, the managers are unable to lead others. They are only capable of leading LIES and causing additional drama at work. They will not help you, they will treat you worse than an outsider customer.

avatar
Ware2Go Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback. We are always looking to improve and enhance our employee experience and feedback is imperative to our development. We value company culture and strive to create a place where all employees feel equally valued. If you’d like to share specific details regarding your review, please connect with our HR team at hr@ware2go.co.

Explore other reviews about Ware2Go

5.0
May 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work, flexible schedule

Cons

Not faced any strong cons

1.0
May 24, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Remote flexibility (depending on what mood UPS was in) and unlimited PTO • A few great coworkers who tried to make the best of a bad situation • UPS affiliation gave us a foot in the door

Cons

• The company was on a downward spiral well before the Stord acquisition • Bala, UPS CTO, actively pushed for the acquisition by Stord in an apparent effort to secure his own contract renewal in June—self-preservation at its finest • Stord unknowingly inherited a weak, unstable book of business with limited profitability and tons of churn • Constant restructuring, shifting priorities, and lack of communication left teams disjointed and demoralized • High-performing employees were let go or burned out, while politics kept underperformers or low paid employees in place • Leadership repeatedly promised change but never delivered—goals moved, quotas inflated, and support was minimal • Culture was surface-level at best, with little accountability or trust in management

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All