Good place to work so far - Field Service Engineer III WGNSTAR Employee Review

4.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Solid people and straightforward hiring process.

Cons

Contract based work so more prone to feast and famine.

avatar
WGNSTAR Response
4d
Thank you for sharing your experience. It’s great to hear that the hiring process felt straightforward and that you’ve had a positive experience with the people you work alongside. We’re glad these aspects have contributed to a strong start in your role. We also appreciate your note about the nature of contract based work and how it can impact consistency. Feedback like this helps us better understand the realities of the role and where we can continue to support our teams. Thank you again for taking the time to share your thoughts.

Explore other reviews about WGNSTAR

5.0
May 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

∙ Excellent learning opportunity ∙ Technical work that helps me improve my skills ∙ I like working with equipment, running tests, and solving real problems. ∙ Strong, collaborative team; I never feel completely on my own. ∙ Good pay and benefits

Cons

You have to follow strict procedures and spend long hours on your feet

avatar
WGNSTAR Response
2w
Thank you for sharing your experience. It’s great to hear that you’re gaining strong practical experience through technical work, testing equipment, and problem solving, and that the collaborative team environment helps you feel supported. We’re glad the learning opportunities, along with the pay and benefits, are contributing positively to your role. We also appreciate your feedback about the physical demands and the need to follow strict procedures. We understand how spending long hours on your feet can be challenging, and we’re always looking at ways to strengthen training and support. Thank you again for taking the time to share your thoughts and suggestions.
1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The other technicians actually knew what they were doing, which made the work itself manageable.

Cons

- The real issue is the person in charge, who was promoted without any real management experience and it shows in every decision. - It is clear the selection had little to do with capability and more to do with appearances or personal preference rather than actual skill. -There is no understanding of the work, no understanding of the team, and no understanding of how to manage people. - Instructions come from above that are confusing, contradictory, and completely lacking any real direction or planning. - The result is constant confusion presented as structure, while employees are left to deal with the consequences. - Watching someone struggle in a role they are not qualified for while everyone else absorbs the fallout becomes exhausting very quickly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All