Misleading "unlimited PTO", and continued moral decay related to disallowing teams to share information - Senior Devops/AWS Engineer Veeva Systems Employee Review

4.0
Dec 13, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leading edge software and security best practices good/competitive compensation

Cons

CEO is involved in the hiring process for every single employee CEO has certain rules that cause disruptions/distractions to solving business problems such as: * Blacklisting certain companies. - CEO has created a rule for recruiters and hiring managers to not hire from specific companies (Cisco, Intel, Apple are some companies on the list). When I was hired from one of these companies, my manager had to provide a 2-page written report every 3 months for the first year and he presented it in person to the CEO to continually prove that I should be allowed to stay at the company. There were extra interviews at the on-boarding stage to ensure I was a good fit, and it all felt like a huge waste of time. This rule was constantly brought up when I attempted to introduce new / innovations in our tools and processes and I was told more than 15 times in both private and large meetings that "my ideas were not welcome because I had come from one of those blacklisted companies." It was never surprising when my proposals were later re-introduced by someone else and then were accepted and integrated as business solutions - it just felt more and more frustrating as time passed. Additionally, senior managers would describe that process of denying my suggestions based on where I came from previously as a "test to me, and now let's see if I'll stay in a company that doesn't want my big corporate ideas". - separation of engineering teams meant tools and innovations were kept secret, such that each team needed to re-invent the wheel in their own way to solve common problems. This concept made the jobs for IT system administrators, and security extremely difficult since the teams they were supporting could not share information and tools. If one devops team solved a series of issues related to the migration to a common software, the other devops team was forced to learn how to solve the same business issues without the benefit of communicating with the other team. There is no sharing of knowledge even if it meant fixing problems that hurt the bottom line. In the business of deploying solutions to production, this was a bad decision that was constantly being replayed and causing frustration across multiple teams.

Explore other reviews about Veeva Systems

5.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good company good benefits goid culture

Cons

Average pay tech stack lagging

1
2.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People in your class are mostly great

Cons

Technically I am a Senior Associate. Day before promotions, got rid of promotion to Supervisor for everyone. Demoted certain people in the Analytics department. Imagine working for a promotion for 2 years and getting great feedback by your manager and everyone in your class is told never mind. They likely did it due to the high turnover - many people would leave post-promotion for better opportunities. Regardless, cruel and unprofessional Poor management/leadership, large blame culture, poor pay w/ minimal raises, high turnover, minimal diversity. I know some women being paid less than their male counterparts. I know the Analytics Services Associate job posting seems interesting, but everyone I know who’s here is looking to leave because it is so toxic and defeating, even when you’re doing “great”. I would never grow my career here, specifically in Crossix.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All