Not a good company to work for. - Technical Support Engineer Veeam Software Employee Review

1.0
Aug 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only real benefit is that it's a day shift job.

Cons

The management is really poor. The team is fully handled by Russians who don’t understand how to manage Indian employees. Even during a crisis in Bangalore, they still expect you to come to the office. The hike process is also very bad, and the KPIs are unrealistic.

avatar
Veeam Software Response
10mo
We apologize for your negative experience and would like to take the opportunity to respond. We're truly sorry to learn about your negative experience with our work environment and management. We take your feedback seriously. as it highlights critical areas where we can make significant improvements. Your insights are essential in guiding us to create a better working environment, and we are committed to addressing these issues to ensure that all employees feel valued and supported

Explore other reviews about Veeam Software

5.0
Jun 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Cons

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

avatar
Veeam Software Response
5d
Thank you for sharing this! We're really glad to hear you're enjoying the work-life balance and that the caliber of your colleagues has been a standout - that's something we hear often and are proud of. Growth through acquisitions does come with its challenges, and we're working hard to make those transitions as smooth as possible for our teams. We appreciate your patience and continued contributions!
2.0
Feb 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Cons

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All