Hybrid work and competitive salary, but unclear growth path - Software Developer Veeam Software Employee Review

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hybrid working environment, comptetiv salary

Cons

Creear grow path is not visible

avatar
Veeam Software Response
1mo
Thank you for your feedback and for your continued commitment to the team in Prague. We're glad the hybrid setup and compensation have been positives for you. Career path visibility is something we take seriously. We encourage you to work with your manager on an Individual Development Plan during your next Veeam Conversation, and to explore resources like MentorLab — both are designed to help map out your next steps more clearly. Your feedback reminds us to keep making those paths more transparent for everyone. Thank you for continuing to be part of the Veeam team.

Explore other reviews about Veeam Software

5.0
Jun 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work life balance. Working with some of the smartest people I've ever worked with.

Cons

Growing pains of acquiring more companies.

avatar
Veeam Software Response
1d
Thank you for sharing this! We're really glad to hear you're enjoying the work-life balance and that the caliber of your colleagues has been a standout - that's something we hear often and are proud of. Growth through acquisitions does come with its challenges, and we're working hard to make those transitions as smooth as possible for our teams. We appreciate your patience and continued contributions!
2.0
Feb 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Cons

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All