Pros
Flexible PTO when allowed to take it.
Cons
Worked at Unleashed Brands during a period of extremely high turnover and organizational change within the accounting department. At one point, I was the second longest-tenured employee on the team with only around 9 months of tenure, which speaks to the level of instability and retention issues. The accounting close cycle regularly stretched 20–25 days, making it difficult to stay ahead of current work while simultaneously managing prior month responsibilities. As employees left and roles were consolidated, workloads continued to expand with very little ability to push back or deprioritize tasks. Expectations frequently shifted, priorities changed often, and there was a significant lack of documented processes or standardized procedures, making training and consistency difficult across the department. Management responsiveness to questions and requests for clarification was also inconsistent, which created additional frustration in an already fast-paced environment. Employees were often expected to navigate changing responsibilities without clear guidance or sufficient support. There were also conflicting expectations around priorities — employees could be told to immediately stop their own work to assist other team members, while still being evaluated on personal KPIs and deadlines tied to their individual productivity and progress. This created confusion around performance expectations and made it difficult to consistently succeed in the role. Employees were initially sold on autonomy and ownership within their roles, but the environment gradually shifted into a much more team-dependent structure with changing expectations that were not always clearly communicated. PTO policies and flexibility also seemed to vary depending on leadership interpretation, which created confusion and frustration among employees. The return-to-office decision appeared to accelerate turnover significantly, with many positions vacated or eliminated following the change.