Visit, but don't stay... - Analyst IV-Supervisor UCSF Health Employee Review

2.0
May 20, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can go to sleep at night knowing that, even if it's in a small, indirect way, you've contributed to improving the health and quality of life for many people. The benefits package is outstanding. If you live in SF, commuting is a dream; the Parnassus campus is right off the N-Judah, and UCSF offers free shuttle service to its other sites.

Cons

The biggest downside is the culture--- behavior that would be unacceptable in a 3rd grade classroom is tolerated here. I've worked at two other academic hospitals, and I find the abuse by physicians (toward staff) at UCSF to be shocking. Very little opportunity for mentoring or professional advancement for administrative/nonclinical positions. There is no incentive for bright, educated staff to stay beyond two years--- the benefits ARE terrific, but salaries are too low and not competitive. It breaks my heart to see UCSF continue to lose bright, talented folks, while holding onto the deadweights (who know that the bureaucracy will protect them forever). Labor Relations offers no support to managers. If you're interested in working in a school of medicine, look to Stanford. If you want to work in an outpatient setting, look to Sutter (CPMC).

Explore other reviews about UCSF Health

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunities to learn new skills. My team is excellent.

Cons

New leadership models prioritize profit over employee well-being. They are starting to thin out our staffing more and more. Morale is very low right now on our unit ...

1.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people that work at UCSF are some of the most intelligent analysts I've ever worked with in 15 years of Health IT. Most are ex-Epic employees with strong backgrounds in project managament and IT,

Cons

UCSF recently decided to reclassify all remote employees as "Felxible" without their input or permission. As a result, employees must now travel to the office WITHOUT expenses paid. This means that flights, hotels, etc. are NOT reimbursed and are paid by the employee. UCSF has not answered to what problem they are trying to solve with this, and refuses to answer how this action aligns with goals such as sustainability (carbon emissions), equity (women and disabled are more impacted by eliminating remote work), working accommodating (UCSF does not have the physical space for all of the Clinical Systems department to be on site. There is no locked storage or accessible workspaces.), safety (there is no shuttle for UCSF to all locations that have been mentioned for work). UCSF limits employee growth, by eliminating actual promotions with "role based work". In other words, you have to do more work without compensation for it. They have also completely reneged on remote management, meaning that most employees are now at a dead end.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All