Casino internal mobility policy - Anonymous employee TotalEnergies Employee Review

3.0
Mar 19, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- generally friendly environment and colleagues - work life balance (depends on entity though) - employee share purchase programme

Cons

Once you indicate that you want internal transfer during appraisal by ticking internal mobility, your job will be posted internally for others to apply. If you cannot find an internal job before your boss finds your replacement, your replacement can replace you and you will be parked under special project. You do not know what you'll be doing under special project and first to go if there is retrenchment, causing undue stress. It is also not clearly communicated as the aforesaid conditions are not spelled out in the appraisal form when one ticks and signs internal mobility. It is crucial to spell out such onerous conditions as every candidate deserves the right to be reminded so as to make an informed decision. Also, one doesn't need to tick internal mobility and can still apply internal jobs and enjoy pari passu, so it doesn't make sense to tick at all. Ticking mobility will only benefit: i) your N+1 who may be eager to find someone to understudy and replace you especially if your N+1 is not familiar with your work which is not uncommon; and ii) talent developers whose job is to move people around despite the associated turnover of the policy. Maybe the intent of this “innovative” policy is good but it has many question marks and shouldn’t take employee’s job as a game of cards.

Explore other reviews about TotalEnergies

5.0
Jan 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work culture and decent pay. Overall a great place to work.

Cons

I don’t have any cons honestly

1.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Hybrid work option and free parking.

Cons

As a contractor, the expectations were extremely high while the benefits, recognition, and job security were significantly lower compared to full-time employees. Contractors were often expected to handle multiple responsibilities due to constant pressure from upper management to reduce headcount, creating a stressful and draining work environment. Despite proving your value through consistent performance over years, contractors still seemed overlooked for growth opportunities. In some cases, employees with only a few months of tenure were promoted into full-time roles, while experienced contractors were passed over. There was also a noticeable amount of workplace politics, and at times the culture did not feel fully inclusive or supportive. Compensation was decent, but overall work-life balance, contractor treatment, and career progression opportunities need major improvement

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All